How the Debate Over Birth Control Changed Catholic Theology: The Structure of Theological Revolutions by Mark Massa, S.J.
2018 marks the 50th Anniversary of the landmark papal encyclical Humanae Vitae, which declared artificial birth control "intrinsically disordered" and marked an ethical line in the sand that has alternatively alienated and energized Catholics for the past 50 years. Mark Massa S.J. argues in his recent book, The Structure of Theological Revolutions: How the Fight Over Birth Control Transformed American Catholicism, that the encyclical gave birth to a series of paradigm shifts in understanding what natural law is, and how it informs the moral life. Further, Massa examines the introduction of Humanae Vitae in order to make a case for how theological development is messy, disjointed, and hardly the result of one, unified, tradition.
In the Boisi Center's Author Meets His Critics panel event, Massa will respond to the comments and critiques of three commentators: Lisa Sowle Cahill (Boston College), James Keenan, S.J. (Boston College), and Meghan Clark (St. John's University).
Director of the Boisi Center, Mark Massa, S.J., opens his newest book with Giuseppe Tomasi de Lampedusa: “If we want everything to stay the same, everything has to change.” Change, in Catholic theology more broadly and in natural law specifically, was the subject of a critical panel on Massa’s recent publication The Structure of Theological Revolutions: How the Fight Over Catholic Theology Transformed American Catholicism. Introduced and moderated by Richard Gaillardetz (Boston College), the panelists included Meghan Clark (St. John’s University), James Keenan, S.J. (Boston College), and one of the authors profiled in Massa’s book, Lisa Sowle Cahill (Boston College).
The panelists praised Massa’s fair exposition of four competing natural law paradigms, but pressed him with a further question: what will be the next paradigm? Massa offered that there are several ways the conversation on natural law can develop. One may be a new paradigm arising from liberation theology in conversation with global movements of the LGBTQ+ community and the American Latinx and Black Lives Matter movements.
Another conversation, Massa hopes, may be a deeper engagement between academic theologians and the papacy. After Humanae Vitae’s publication, many of the sharpest oppositions to its teachings came from academic theologians who strongly disagreed with the theological assumptions and conclusions as being faithful to natural law. Massa hopes that both sides can take a cue from some of the collaborative relationships found among the medievals, where academic theologians worked closely with the papacy to achieve theologically sound conclusions on religious matters.
The panel concluded with Clark offering a reminder that what exacerbates the debate on birth control within the Catholic church is the level of misinformation both ideologically and, especially, historically. Massa agrees that the import of historical knowledge is at the heart of the book, pressing that one takeaway is that natural law has developed and evolved over time, and not as one coherent tradition or one linear progression. Gaillardetz concluded the panel discussion by calling attention to the prevailing perception, regarding Pope Paul VI and others, that if the church changes its stance on one issue it risks undermining the authority of the whole institution. Massa’s book, opening up the conversation around natural law to its historicist nature, offers a careful way forward in conceiving of such change without fear.
Kaiser, Robert Blair. The Encyclical that Never Was: The Story of the Pontifical Commission on Population, Family, and Birth, 1964. London: Sheed and Ward, 1985.
Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012. 4th Edition, 1962.
Massa, Mark. The Structure of Theological Revolutions: How the Fight Over Birth Control Transformed American Catholicism. London, UK: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Noonan, John. Contraception: A History of Its Treatment by Catholic Theologians and Canonists. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1965.
Shannon, William H. The Lively Debate: The Response to "Humanae Vitae." New York: Sheed and Ward, 1970.
Cosacchi, Daniel. Review: Birth control and the Church, 50 years later. America Magazine, October 1, 2018.
Gjelten, Tom. 50 Years Ago, The Pope Called Birth Control 'Intrinsically Wrong'. National Public Radio, July 3, 2018.
Paul VI. Humane Vitae [Encyclical on Human Life]. Vatican Website, July 25, 1965.
Winters, Michael Sean. In defense of 'Humanae Vitae'. National Catholic Reporter, July 25, 2018.
In the News
2018 marks fifty years since Pope Paul VI released Humanae Vitae. NPR’s Tom Gjelten surveys Catholics on what the encyclical’s teaching means for the U.S. Church today. Gjelten quotes Mark Massa, S.J.: “When people see what they regard as bad law, it breeds contempt for good law.” Gjelten questions whether U.S. Catholics “show in their daily lives that the church's official prohibition of artificial birth control means little in practice, even if it has some value in theory.”