To accept the school would be to give in and act white, to give up the value of the street for some other thing. And the value of that other thing has not been sufficiently explained. . . . In fact, the code of the street, and by extension the oppositional culture, competes very effectively with traditional values. . . . Alienated black students take on the oppositional role so effectively that they often become models for other disaffected students.
Elijah Anderson, Code of the Street 97 (1999); see also William Julius Wilson, When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor 72 (1996).
The inhabitants of the Northern statesparticularly Punjab, Jammu and Kashmir, Rajasthan, and parts of Uttar Pradeshare on the whole fairer than those of the Southern states. Indeed, many North Indians have a vague prejudice against South Indians because of their dark skin color. . . . Within the subcaste, a certain amount of selective breeding has no doubt taken place for centuries. . . . The ideal bride, whose beauty and virtue are praised in the songs sung at marriages, almost always has a light complexion. . . . Even a casual examination of the matrimonial columns of such popular dailies as The Hindu, The Hindustan Times, or The Hindustan Standard shows that virginity and a light skin color are among the most desirable qualities in a bride.
Id.
Immigrant groups have for many centuries been a familiar and important part of the British community. Mostly refugees from persecution in other European countries . . . all these groups were white-skinned. They could, if they chose, fade without difficulty into the white background. The colored immigrant is and seems likely to remain the exception. His high visibility is a constant reminder to Britons of his earliest relationship with themslave to owner, subject to sovereign, conquered to conqueror, and man to master.
Id.
A Career Ambassador is the highest rank in the Foreign Service and equates to a four star general. There are nine blacks serving as ambassadors, only one is a political appointee, who is serving in Trinidad and is a Yale grad. Of the eight career Foreign Service Officers, six attended selective schools; (U.S.C., DePauw, Syracuse, Brown, Tufts and UCLA). The other two attended Virginia State 1968 and Western College for Women in Ohio that same year. They may or may not have had much choice when entering college in 1964. There are five blacks who are Ambassador-designates and must be confirmed by the Senate. All are career officers. Four went to Penn, Harvard, UCLA and Hampton (then Ohio U. for grad school). The fifth attended Emory University in Atlanta and graduated second in his class.
The very fact that colored people are singled out and expressly denied by a statute all right to participate in the administration of the law, as jurors, because of their color, . . . [is] practically a brand upon them, affixed by the law, an assertion of their inferiority, and a stimulant to that race prejudice which is an impediment to securing to individuals of the race . . . [equal justice].
Id. at 308. The concept of stigma in the affirmative action context uses the term to refer to blacks who are benefiting from the programs, unlike Strauder where blacks were excluded from juries.
There is no moral or constitutional equivalence between a policy that is designed to perpetuate a caste system and one that seeks to eradicate racial subordination. Invidious discrimination is an engine of oppression, subjugating a disfavored group to enhance or maintain the power of the majority. Remedial race-based preferences reflect the opposite impulse: a desire to foster equality in society. No sensible conception of the Governments constitutional obligation to govern impartially, . . . should ignore this distinction.
Id. at 243. Although social conditions were not under consideration, caste system and racial subordination are parts of social conditions theory. See supra Part II.A.1.
It is not a constitutional defect in this program that it may disappoint the expectations of nonminority firms. When effectuating a limited and properly tailored remedy to cure the effects of prior discrimination, such a sharing of the burden by innocent parties is not impermissible. . . . Moreover, although we may assume that the complaining parties are innocent of any discriminatory conduct, it was within congressional power to act on the assumption that in the past some nonminority businesses may have reaped competitive benefit over the years from the virtual exclusion of minority firms from these contracting opportunities.
448 U.S. 448, 48485 (1978). Adarand has since overruled Fullilove. See Adarand, 515 U.S. at 202.
When this price is considered reasonable, it is in part because it is a price to be paid only temporarily: if the justification for the preference is eliminating the effects of a past practice, the assumption is that the effects will themselves recede into the past, becoming attenuated and finally disappearing.
Id. at 270. Justice Powell has written: As part of this Nations dedication to eradicating racial discrimination, innocent persons may be called upon to bear some of the burden of the remedy. Wygant, 476 U.S. at 28081.
the Court will not render advisory opinions; constitutional issues affecting legislation will not be determined in friendly, non adversary proceedings; in advance of the necessity of deciding them; in broader terms than are required by the precise facts to which the ruling is to be applied; [at] the instance of one who fails to show that he is injured by the statutes operation; [or] if a construction of the statute is fairly possible by which the question may be avoided.
Id.; see also Ashwander v. Tenn. Valley Auth., 297 U.S. 288, 341 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring).