If the earth must lose that great portion of its pleasantness which it owes to things that the unlimited increase of wealth and population would extirpate from it, for the mere purpose of enabling it to support a larger, but not a better or a happier population, I sincerely hope, for the sake of posterity, that they will be content to be stationary, long before necessity compels them to it.
John Stuart Mill, Principles of Political Economy 75051 (Augustus M. Kelley ed., 1987). The current debate between mainstream and ecological economists can be understood as a debate over whether Mills stationary state has become, as he predicted, necessary, rather than merely desirable.
[A] stationary condition of capital and population implies no stationary state of human improvement. There would be as much scope as ever for all kinds of mental culture, and moral and social progress; as much room for improving the Art of Living, and more likelihood of its being improved, when minds ceased to be engrossed by the art of getting on. Even the industrial arts might be as earnestly and as successfully cultivated, with this sole difference, that instead of serving no purpose but the increase of wealth, industrial improvements would produce their legitimate effect, that of abridging labour.
Mill, supra note 27, at 751.
Overall, the decline of the GPI in the 1990s has been the most rapid in five decades. It suggests that the recent financial boom, with the associated shopping spree, has masked an erosion in the real economy that the conventional indicators hide. Increasingly the U. S. is living off its capitalsocial and environmental as well as financial. In the parlance of policy experts, the economy has become rife with unintended consequences, as well as intended though unspoken ones.
Jonathan Rowe & Mark Anielski, Genuine Progress Indicator 1998: Executive Summary, available at http://www.rprogress.org/publications/gpi1998/gpi1998_execsum.html (last mod-ified Mar. 1999).