Journal Contents

Student Publications Homepage

ARTICLE CONTENTS

[Pages 223-265]
TOP OF ARTICLE

Introduction
I.  Three Doctrines
    A.  The Political Question Doctrine
    B.  The Act of State Doctrine
    C.  The International Comity Doctrine
II.  Three Cases
    A.  Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
    B.  Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC
    C.  Doe v. Unocal Corp.
III.  Human Rights-Friendly Doctrine
    A.  Sarei: A Political Question?
        1.  Baker Factors One Through Three: A Minor Threat
        2.  Baker Factor Five: “Adherence to a Political Decision Already Made”
        3.  Baker Factors Four Through Six
    B.  Unocal: No Act of State
        1.  Unocal As an Example for Exxon and Future Cases
        2.  A Human Rights Approach to the Sabbatino Factors
    C.  Hopeful Signs for the International Comity Doctrine
IV.  Executive Intervention: Bad Public Policy
    A.  Setting a Trend
    B.  Public Policy and the Adjudication of Sensitive Claims
        1.  Ineffective Human Rights Policy
        2.  Short-Sighted Foreign Policy
Conclusion