|
|||||
The Crisis of the American Academic Workforce
Philip G. Altbach and Martin J. Finkelstein
The former New York governor, Eliot Spitzer, declared the desire to improve public higher education by adding 2,000 new faculty members and creating an endowment of $4 billion to make his state more competitive. Editorials in the New York Times and the Boston Globe agreed that higher education must be a priority for competitiveness. Nationwide, financial allocations to public higher education are up 7.5 percent, the greatest increase in a decade. The stakes are high in the knowledge economy, and higher education is central to winning. Colleges and universities train the next generation of bright entrepreneurs and scientists, generate the research that fuels the knowledge economy, and sustain local economic development. Key to an improvement in so labor intensive an industry as higher education is its workforce: the professoriate. The American academic profession is, however, widely acknowledged to be in "critical"and deterioratingcondition. The problem is in part demographic. The average professor is now over 50 years of age and nearly one in five over 60. Perhaps half will be retiring in the coming decade. Many disciplines, especially in ones related to science and technology, suffer a dearth of new PhDs to fill the ranks of those who will retire or the new positions that might be added. Another problem concerns remuneration. Academic salaries, on average, are not competitive with comparable jobs outside higher education. While the "best and the brightest" have never been lured to academe by money alone, salaries must be adequate to support a middle-class lifestyle. While a small percentage of senior professors at top universities receive six-figure salaries, the average professor earns below $70,000on a par with newly graduating nurses. Salaries at the top institutions, especially the prestigious private universities, have expanded much more rapidly than those at the public colleges and universities, which 80 percent of American students attend. Even institutions like Berkeley and Wisconsin worry that they can no longer compete with the best private universities. Many experts feel qualms about the future attractiveness of the profession. Some concerns involve a dwindling supply of qualified PhDs, the high dropout rates in doctoral programs, and lengthening time-to-degree. The Harvard-based Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education sees a risk in the attrition among faculty who actually enter the academic ranks in their early career yearssimilar to the "hemorrhaging" attrition among new public school teachers and nurses. Perhaps the greatest crisis is a sea change in the nature of academic employment contracts. Traditionally, most academics were full-time on the "tenure track." They were hired fresh out of graduate school with a PhD as an assistant professor, and if they demonstrated adequate, and usually exemplary, performance they would be promoted to a tenured position with the expectation, with ongoing good performance, of a lifetime job. Academics earned somewhat lower salaries in order to have the security of tenure, which protects academic freedom. A reasonably robust job market assured most young scholars and scientists of a full-time tenure track appointment after completing the long grind of doctoral study. The profession attracted young people interested in "the life of the mind" to teaching and in many cases to research as well.
The Deterioration of the Career This change is having a profound, and largely unscrutinized, impact on American higher education. It means that a large number of professors lack a real connection or commitment to their institutions. They do not participate in the collegial governance that has characterized American higher education for more than a century. Academic freedom is absent. The marginalized academic force does no research and has little direct contact with or responsibility for the students they teach. They are, in many ways, like the "taxicab" professors of Latin America who come to campus to teach a course or two and then leave. This situation also means that the full-time faculty, especially those who are tenured, have increased responsibility for advising students, participating in institutions' decision making, and conducting research. Professional careers are diminished by the new arrangements. America is constructinglargely below the radar screen of public officialsa two-tiered university with a small elite cadre of full-time faculty increasingly overstressed by responsibilities and a large mass of part-time and temporary workers with few benefits and tenuous connections to their jobs or institutions. Preliminary research suggests that this new edifice may be compromising the student learning experience, the functioning of academic units, and the long-term health of the national R&D enterprise.
The Future This article appeared in the Buffalo News. [Online] Available: http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/Number52/p9_Altbach_Finkelstein.htm |