Labels Can Give Students a Sense of
Belonging or Alienation

By Donald Brown
April 13, 1989

Home | Services | Staff | Resources | E-mail

 

The term AHANA is not degrading, inaccurate or stereotypical. It is creative, unique and a symbol of pride. AHANA was not developed to segregate its members from the remainder of the Boston College community. It was developed to unite its members for the good of all. To inspire cultural awareness and destroy the void among students of different racial backgrounds. We do not want to feel "minor."
These words, these feelings, were presented to the Boston College Board of Trustees a decade ago by several undergraduate students arguing that "minority" was an offensive and unacceptable term when applied to people of color. Their recommendation, soon adopted, called for the use of the term AHANA, an acronym for African-American, Hispanic, Asian and Native American. Today, AHANA is an accepted part of the Boston College vocabulary. Language terminology can be a powerful agent for change in a society. Some years ago, T. S. Eliot wrote, "Every vital development in language is a development of feeling as well." From Aristophanes: "High thoughts must have high language." The change, then, from the use of the term minority to AHANA at Boston College has been both symbolic and motivational, one of feeling and high thought.
Certainly, terminology factors prominently into the retention of students of color attending predominately white colleges and universities in America. There is perhaps no groups of students more heartened by the recent debate over the use of the term African-American vs. Black than the AHANA students at Boston College. They are excited because October 9, 1989 will mark the tenth anniversary since students of color at Boston College rejected the term minority and replaced it with the more positive term, AHANA.
Since the name change, several fine things have transpired for AHANA students at Boston College. First, there is a profound sense of community among the shared sectors of the AHANA population on campus. Also, they have moved from tiny quarters with two small offices to an entire house centrally located in the mainstream of the campus and where their immediate neighbors are university vice president, deans and so on. The AHANA House, as it is affectionately called, has now become too small to accommodate the large number of students who avail themselves of the support services provided by the office.
More importantly, however, are the numbers of AHANA students who are graduating from Boston College. The retention rate of 17 percent among AHANA Students at the time I assumed responsibility for the "Office of Minority Student Programs" ten years ago has been increased to a present retention rate of 83 percent. This is a figure for the average students identified by Boston College's Admissions and AHANA Student Programs offices as requiring support services in order to negotiate the university. While it is clear the name change alone was not an instant panacea to the difficulties being experienced by AHANA students to Boston College - a full array of support services, including committed staff, tutorials, academic advisement, personal counseling and performance monitoring, are crucial elements as well - it is unarguable that the change in name contributed enormously to success.
A brief description of how the term AHANA came into existence is illuminating, as it speaks to student leadership and empowerment and provides food for thought for directors of retention programs who all too frequently bemoan the fact that students of color do not avail themselves of services provided by their offices.
Consider the following: Shortly after my arrival at Boston College in 1978, I was approached by two students, one black, the other Hispanic. These students, acting as emissaries of fellow students of color, informed me they were offended by the term "minority" in the name of the office that had recently been established to provide support to students of color at Boston College. Because they were offended by the term, I was told, substantial numbers of students of color vowed never to come anywhere near the office of Minority Student Programs. I asked Alfred, a Hispanic student from Bayamon, Puerto Rico, and Valerie, a Black woman from Jersey City, why the term minority was offensive. Both informed me that it was unsettling to have come from cities where one day, they were an overwhelming majority and the next day, on arriving at Boston College, they were cast into the role of minority. Further explanation provided me with several valuable lessons.
First, they cited the dictionary definition of "minority" as further evidence that the term is pejorative and means "less than." Furthermore, they pointed, the term minority conveyed similarly demeaning implications as did the expressions culturally deprived, educationally disadvantaged, underprivileged, lower class and so on. Both of these young people said that one day they hoped to have children, and when they did, they did not want them to view themselves as less than anything.
A second revelation from these students was of a demographic nature. When one adds together all the persons of color in the world, they pointed out, they outnumber Caucasians by a margin of 11-to-1. Both of these young people were emphatic in their view that they felt a kinship - and chose to identify - with the worlds majority, and therefore could in no way ever be considered a minority. Yet, another revelation from Valerie was that the Black students at Boston College fully subscribed to that principle of Kwanza, which speaks to self-determination: "Kujichagalia" - "to define, to name and speak for ourselves instead of being spoken for by others." A manifestation of their resolve was to flatly reject the label minority.
Having eloquently stated their case, these students indicated that they wished to ask the university's board of trustees to consider changing the term "minority" to AHANA. The concept was enthusiastically embraced by many across the campus, and at their meeting, the trustees warmly received the student presentation. Afterwards, the students returned to my office, reported that the presentation was a huge success and asked if the "Minority Student Programs" sign could be removed from the office door. From that day, we have been the Office of AHANA Student Programs at Boston College.
Though much work remains ahead, we are pleased to report that the Office of AHANA Student Programs recently was identified by the Educational Testing Services in its report, Improving Minority Retention in Higher Education: A search for Effective Institutional Practices as one of four model programs in the United States.

 
Back to Top
Back to Web Resources
 

 

 

1998 © OASP
Questions, comments, or suggestions? Send us
feedback
Maintained by
S. Luie
Last Update: 01/23/03