The Boston College Office of Public Affairs Boston College Chronicle Contact: smthsen@bc.edu Date Posted: 9-5-97 ============================================================= Remarks by University President William P. Leahy, SJ Annual Faculty Convocation Sept. 3, 1997 Robsham Theater Boston College Welcome to the 1997 University Convocation and my first address to you as a seasoned president of Boston College -- that is, a man who always reads the sports pages first. As you know, I have spent a great deal of time during the last year listening and learning about Boston College, as I promised I would. I would like to divide my remarks this afternoon into three parts: 1) offer some reflections about the past academic year and my experiences; 2) focus on five themes or issues which I believe we need to engage as the Boston College community; and 3) finally and most significantly, announce within the context of those themes that Boston College will over the next five years be making a $260 million investment in academic personnel, programs, and facilities. It is an investment that is carefully designed to raise Boston College to an even greater level of distinction as a national university preparing students for an increasingly international, multi-cultural world and an institution ever committed to its Jesuit, Catholic mission and heritage. By so many standards, this was a wonderful year for BC and an enjoyable one for me. I could cite a hundred moments and accomplishments that would give any college president cause for pride and that, as each occurred, made me feel privileged to be here. This community has welcomed me with great warmth and good will. Members of my family who were here last fall for inauguration still talk about their visit to Boston. I have also been greeted warmly by our alumni and supporters on numerous occasions. I don't know how many of you will ever experience this, but it is remarkable and humbling to find yourself the representative of an institution for whom people feel so profoundly. I have discovered in talking with alumni that when BC hurts, so do they. And when BC succeeds, they rejoice as if it had happened to their family. They want us to thrive, to be a place of excellence, of distinction, and honor. And we are. We have made and are making great strides. The Class of 2001 is the strongest in our history as measured by standardized test scores, and should again place among the top 25 freshman classes in the entire nation. Three of our professional schools--Nursing, Law, and Education--were rated in the top 30 in their disciplines by the US News & World Report while the Graduate School of Social Work was ranked 14th. In fund-raising we set a record for total gifts received--$27 million. We had challenges too: the gambling violations by football players and other students, and the decision not to admit two students who were basketball players. But we have addressed these issues, and I am confident that our new personnel in athletics will do their part to make sure that intercollegiate sports occupies its proper place at Boston College. We intend to compete and be successful at our current Division IA level; there are no plans to downgrade intercollegiate athletics at Boston College. But while athletics is important, academics are central. The final decision about the admission of student-athletes and all our students will remain in the very capable hands of John Mahoney and his staff in Undergraduate Admission. I am sure you recall the student protests of last spring, sparked by publication of a cartoon in the Observer that some found offensive. Members of our community spoke out against the tone and content of the cartoon, as was their right and responsibility when faced with what they deemed hateful expression. The protest soon broadened to include a call for more AHANA faculty and students and University recognition of a gay, lesbian, and bisexual student group. A great deal of understandable emotion surfaced about these issues, and we should respond in a balanced, fair way to them or other concerns. I think we all know that we need to improve our record in hiring persons of color and in enrolling students from varied ethnic backgrounds. As regards gay, lesbian, and bisexual members of our community, I reiterate that every person associated with Boston College is entitled to a life among us of dignity, accomplishment, respect, and safety. And these rights will be protected by the University. Since last year, I have been asked more than once whether I would continue striving to be present to the Boston College community, and my answer has been yes. If I could, I would lift Botolph House up and place it in middle of O'Neill Plaza. I cannot do that, of course, partly because it isn't in Fred Pennino's budget. And it's not on the agenda of the Newton Board of Aldermen either. But my goal is to be at the vital center of Boston College in the years ahead, to be a participant as well as a leader in many conversations. In fact, you may consider my first announcement of this convocation to be that I have decided to establish what I am calling Conversations with the President. Two or three times each semester, beginning this fall, I intend to ask groups of faculty, staff, and students to join me for several hours of informal discussion about Boston College. I very much want to continue the listening and learning I began a year ago. Part of what made the past year notable and useful for me was preparing for reaccreditation by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges and working to implement the goals expressed in the report of the University Academic Planning Council. Such meetings helped me to understand Boston College and its opportunities and challenges in a much deeper way. And that brings me to the second part of my Convocation remarks: Boston College's future, specifically areas which require serious engagement by all of us if we are to thrive as an institution of higher education with our special mission and heritage. But first, let me say that the future of Boston College cannot be the past of any other university. History has formed us in a unique way. Our gifts, our strengths, and our inspirations are our own. And in choosing what to become, we must be mindful of who we are and have been. Aspirations that are chosen with care can be realized, however demanding they may be. They will be the signs of progress and steeples of excellence that signal our place and our abilities to the world. Aspirations that are chosen from envy or wishful thinking or lack of thought seldom become realities. We must be as authentic in our dreams as we are in our lives. I am convinced that there are five areas that demand our attention now and into the near future, and each, I believe, is strongly linked to our core strengths and values as an institution. They are: 1) intellectual vitality; 2) community life; 3) Catholic and Jesuit identity; 4) voluntary support; and 5) efficiency and cost reduction. Let me say a word about each. Intellectual vitality. This is the core of the university because it relates to the central focus of the liberal arts, which is to deepen the sense of intellectual wonder and joy among students, and so to liberate them to think for themselves and to become adults. We should be known for educating men and women for intellectual, spiritual, and community leadership. Special academic programs such as Scholar of the College projects, honors seminars, research, arts performances, and international study should be the norm for our students. But intellectual vitality has many means of measurement: the quality of teaching; the quality of the research conducted by faculty and by graduate students; the subjects students talk about among themselves or with faculty; the way in which we, as a community, utilize guest lecturers and other outside resources; the pleasure we take in the arts; the tone that pervades our residence halls and dining facilities. As you know, this past May, following three years of deliberation and consultation, our Board of Trustees endorsed a set of goals for the strengthening of faculty, undergraduate education, professional and graduate programs, research, and student life. Since the final UAPC report was completed in June, 1996, a committee has been at work translating the UAPC goals into action steps. Father Neenan will be describing some of those details when he speaks, and each of you will receive the complete implementation report later this week in campus mail. The Implementation Plan charts the course to increased intellectual vitality at Boston College. Phased over the next five years, at a total investment of $260 million, it will affect each of you--every academic department and every school. For example, it will increase, by 50, the number of full-time faculty engaged in instruction, especially in the undergraduate core curriculum. It will also ensure that teaching and other responsibilities of researching faculty are competitive with peer institutions. The UAPC implementation document was not written on a tabula rasa. It builds on a history of rapid achievement, on a quarter-century of growth in faculty salaries, graduate and professional program support, and academic facilities such as Merkert Center as well as Devlin, Cushing and Campion Halls. While it will make an extraordinary difference, the UAPC implementation plan is only the next necessary step. It is the step we can see from here because we have climbed to this place. But as it is not the first, neither can it be the last step in the intellectual progress of Boston College. It is part of a continuum of growth that cannot ever end. Community life. There are three aspects to this particular area. One is the life we provide for our students, and most particularly our undergraduate students, for whom we seek to provide an educational experience that encompasses residence halls, recreational facilities, extracurricular opportunities, and social settings. A second aspect of community is inclusiveness. Here we must judge ourselves by the highest standards. We must be a place in which all men and women are welcome. As I noted in my letter on race relations last year, this is for a university like ours not simply a social imperative, but a religious one. Not surprisingly, then, the UAPC implementation plan calls for an increase in the number of minority faculty and graduate students. And that brings me to a third aspect of community: how we relate to each other. I have noted in the last year that the culture of Boston College is often to avoid conflict or to be shocked by it--even the best kind of conflict, the conflict of ideas that leads to discovery about ourselves and about external truths. While we should not promote disagreement for its own sake, we should not shy away from it on this campus. If we treat each other with dignity; if we behave with civility and honesty, then our diversity--in ideas as well as all other things--will make us richer. On the other hand, if we do not really express what we believe, if we turn away from each other because we fear engagement, because it is, after all, easier to live without friction, then we will never be a university of ideas, and no amount of diversity will help us. We will remain isolated and alone. Catholic and Jesuit identity. What is a university that calls itself Catholic and Jesuit? Obviously, this is a complicated question and I do not propose to answer it today, but I think at least four elements or characteristics must be present for an institution to legitimately call itself Catholic and Jesuit. First, it is a place where the curriculum and campus life honors and seriously attends to questions of faith and of the natural human yearning for transcendent understanding, and does so from the perspective, beliefs, and values of Catholicism and its moral and intellectual tradition. Second, it is a place that encounters life and the world in a loving and caring way because this is God's creation and imbued with God's presence. Third, it is a place of Christian humanism-- that honors men and women as God's highest creation, as made in His image. Fourth, it is a place that provides men and women, faculty, staff, and students, with the opportunity to engage in religious inquiry, whether through worship, retreats, or intellectual or personal exploration. I do not have to tell any of you that our planet aches for meaning. One sees it on the evening news, in the faces on the "T," in the hope that extraterrestials landed in the New Mexico in 1947, in the extraordinary cultural reliance upon irony to distance our selves from what we feel, and in the emphasis on income and consumption as the measures of success. That culture affects us at Boston College too. We are part of it. But Boston College, because it is connected to the Catholic intellectual and religious tradition, should offer alternatives to its students and to each of us. It should offer the possibility a faith experience for all on our campus, especially for Catholic believers. It should evidence a reverence for truth, learning, and life. It should allow us, the members of this community, to explore the values we hold and the choices we make as a consequence of those values. Because we are at Boston College, we should have the opportunity to think more deeply and commit ourselves to building up our world and to being vibrant sources of wisdom, faith, and compassion. This should be BC's gift to all who come in contact with it. This should be the example that we set and which no other university can provide as we can--given our unique heritage and mission. The UAPC Implementation Plan offers a number of means for strengthening Jesuit and Catholic identity, of which I will mention one, the Center for Ignatian Spirituality. Founded through a challenge gift from the Jesuit Community, and led by Fr. Howard Gray, this Center will offer programs of retreat and reflection, will be a resource for faculty and staff who wish to explore religious questions as these may relate to work and life. Voluntary support. This is essential for us to realize the academic vision of the UAPC. We can be justly proud of the support we have received in recent years from alumni, parents, and friends. These individuals have helped us to set fundraising records in almost every category of measurement, from membership in the Fides Society to class reunion gifts. But that's not the whole picture. For example, if we look at the critical figure of endowment support per student, we find that in 1996, while Boston College benefited from $2,300 of income per student from its endowment, Notre Dame received $6,000 per student; Brown, $5,300; Duke, $4,300. These are BC's peers and competitors, and they have an immediate advantage because they have those greater resources. At the moment, we are planning a fundraising campaign of crucial importance to BC, an effort that needs the support of everyone connected to Boston College. From my assessment of BC's heritage, goals, and current strength as well as from meetings with alumni and other friends, I am convinced that our mission and case for support are compelling. I also believe that our alumni and supporters are capable in every way of the greater commitment that will be required if we are to achieve our goals. And finally, efficiency and cost reduction. This is the second source of funds for UAPC implementation--the savings gained from reorganization and process reengineering that will be accomplished by Delta and other management initiatives. In the past decade we entered a new arena of competition. The services that we offer must be continually improved also provided as efficiently as possible. Frank will speak shortly about Delta, but I would like to say a few words about the importance of efficiency and cost control. We are an efficient organization. According to a recent study, BC spends fewer administrative dollars per student--in many instances far fewer--than do any of our peer institutions. But relative spending is not the issue for us. The issue is our own patterns of spending and our need to shift as much as is reasonable from funding administrative and support functions to academic goals. If we cannot make these shifts and be more efficient--as well as raise new money-- UAPC implementation, as presently envisioned, will not be possible. Thus, Delta is crucial for our future, and it is an initiative in which I believe and which I think can and will result in a stronger Boston College. Intellectual vitality, community life, Catholic and Jesuit identity, fundraising support, and efficiency and cost reductions are the issues that I see as critical to the future of Boston College. And they will shape my priorities as president. The years ahead will involve meeting new challenges and will require us to become even better at managing change. And doing so without harming the essential elements of our campus culture nor sacrificing our intellectual and religious heritage. In that context, I want to inform you of some personnel changes at Boston College. Most of you already know that John Driscoll has left the post of Vice President for Administration and has become special consultant to me for community and state affairs. John reminds me of Cardinal Newman's words that "It is almost the definition of a gentleman to say that he is one who never inflicts pain." John is a true gentleman, someone who has given so much to BC, especially as a Vice President. And I am very pleased to continue having his counsel and friendship close at hand. A second change concerns Peg Dwyer, who intends to leave as vice president and assistant to the president sometime in the first part of October. Peg, as we all know so well, has been a key figure on this campus since the first year of Father Monan's presidency. Her knowledge of this institution and of higher education, and her sensitivity to both people and issues, have been a tremendous resource to me over the past year, as they have been to hundreds of you since she arrived here in 1973. A third change will occur in the Office of the Academic Vice President and Dean of Faculties. The next five to seven years will be crucial for BC, and we need to do all we can to seize the moment. I am particularly mindful of the demands already on me and the upcoming campaign. I need the help of someone with special gifts and talents in meeting these challenges and opportunities. And so, I have asked Father Neenan to become Assistant to the President and Vice President and to work closely with me, especially to play a key role in our fundraising campaign as we seek the assistance of our alumni and friends for Boston College. Bill will assume his new responsibilities next year after we have found a new Academic Vice President and he has had a sabbatical. I especially have benefited from his warmth, wisdom, wit, and understanding this year, and I am happy I will be working even more closely with him. Last year I stood among you a stranger. This year I look out and see faces I know, people from whom I've drawn strength and knowledge. You are, as I have learned, an extraordinary group of scholars, teachers and staff. Your work, presence, and commitment attract students, enthuse alumni, and win the admiration of individuals I have met in corporate offices, homes, and airports during the past year. As I begin my second year here, I am confident that Boston College has a sense of purpose and a clear mission. It know where it needs to go and the requirements necessary to there. How far it will go, how much it will accomplish, how well it will succeed, are up to all of us who are Boston College. We are on a journey together. That journey--which I have just begun to take with you--will be challenging, demanding and daring in the years just ahead. It will test us at times. But it is a journey toward greatness--of that I have no doubt. Thank you.