Asst. Prof. Jennifer Steen (Political Science): "Spending is only helpful ‚ and this is true in the private sector as well ‚ if the product you are selling is appealing."
Political Capital
Personal wealth does not guarantee campaign success, says Steen
By Greg Frost
Staff Writer
Jesus said money won't buy access to Heaven and the
Beatles said it can't buy love.
Turns out it's not always great at buying public office,
either, according to Asst. Prof. Jennifer Steen (Political
Science).
In her new book, Self-Financed Candidates in Congressional
Elections, Steen examines the spotty record of wealthy
politicians in US House and Senate elections between
1992 and 2000. The good news for American democracy,
she says, is that personal wealth does not constitute
an overwhelming political advantage and isn't a good
barometer for predicting self-financed candidates'
success on Election Day.
Steen's book uses statistical analysis spliced with
real-world anecdotes to show that while self-financing
matters somewhat, in the end it's only as good as the
product being marketed.
"It depends on who is doing the spending,"
she says. "Spending is only helpful - and this
is true in the private sector as well - if the product
you are selling is appealing."
The analogy she likes to use is New Coke, the Coca-Cola
Company's ill-fated launch of a replacement to its
popular soft drink in the mid-1980s. Coca-Cola spent
millions of dollars on promoting the new soft drink,
only to be forced to pull it because of a poor reception
by consumers.
"That's a big problem that a lot of these self-financers
have - their product is not very appealing, which is
to say they're not very appealing," says Steen,
a former California political campaign manager now
in her seventh year on the faculty at Boston College.
Although the book is an academic work, it has policy
implications and has been consulted by policy makers.
Steen recently served as an expert witness for the
defense in the case of a self-financed congressional
candidate from upstate New York who sued the Federal
Election Commission over a provision in the 2002 McCain-Feingold
Act.
In addition to looking at conditions that help spawn
self-financed candidacies, Steen's book shows how millionaire
candidates willing to draw down their own cash reserves
can scare other candidates out of the field.
"Self-financed candidates have horrible track records
in both primaries and in general elections, but their
track records in primaries would be even worse if they
didn't have this chilling effect on competition,"
she says.
Steen cites the example of New Jersey Democratic Congressman
Frank Pallone, who made a brief run for the US Senate
in 2000 but decided to pull out in the face of former
Goldman Sachs CEO Jon Corzine's vast wealth. Corzine
went on to win the Senate seat and now serves as governor
of New Jersey.
"Pallone thought he could win the Democratic nomination
but decided he had better things to do with his time
than take on somebody capable of spending upwards of
$60 million on his own candidacy," she says.
Steen also argues in the book that when it comes to
deciding election outcomes, fundraising is much more
productive than self-financing.
"Part of it has to do with the fact that fundraising
is political activity...The fact that you can go out
and get people to support you shows that you have some
political skill and is an indicator of fundamental
appeal," she says.
"It also adds value to your campaign. Consider
the difference between writing yourself a check for
$1,000,000 and getting 1,000 people to write you a
check for $1,000 each."
Steen is reluctant to make predictions about the overall
outcome of this Tuesday's mid-term elections but thinks
2006 will be a fairly typical year for self-financed
candidates, including the five big-spenders running
for the Senate from Florida, Vermont, Washington, Nebraska
and Arizona.
"They're not going to do well as a group on Election
Day," Steen says of the five. "Maybe one
can pull it off but I'll be surprised if two of those
people win."
• |