|
|||||
Higher Education and the Wayward Labor Market
Wietse de Vries, Alberto Cabrera, and Shaquana Anderson
Sometimes the labor market for university graduates seems unwilling to comply with predictions, most of all those launched by policymakers. In a recent alumni study by the Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, in Mexico, traditional majors were found better suited to local labor demands than novel options. Traditional majors showed higher levels of employment and job satisfaction. Alumni from these majors also indicated higher levels of congruence between work and education. These findings run contrary to at least two decades of public policies—not only in Mexico, but throughout Latin America. Beginning in the 1990s, policymakers and institutional managers, inspired by reports from international organizations including the World Bank and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, began diversifying major offerings based on the notion that traditional options were ill-suited for the demands of the new knowledge-based society. These policies were mostly based on predictions for future regional economies. Students were advised, encouraged, and sometimes pressed to avoid majors such as law, accountancy, administration, medicine, or civil engineering, and to opt for promising novel options like nanotechnology, tourism, environmental engineering, or design. However, these policies have been mostly based on assumptions on what could or should be happening in the regional economies. Alumni studies have been absent and information about labor markets is scarce. Now that these data start to be generated, the assumption about saturated majors is being increasingly questioned. Changing Systems
Furthermore, money has been allocated to novel programs, hiring qualified faculty, and buying equipment to create attractive options. In the Mexican case, the federal government even opted to establish completely new public sectors, such as over 80 technical universities or, recently, 10 intercultural universities. All these institutions were set up with the overt mission to offer alternatives to the saturated traditional options. Public and Private
Reasons for Success
Additionally, several novel options appear to be too specialized, preparing graduates for very specific positions such as ecotourism. For these positions, college graduates largely need to compete with graduates from traditional majors whose qualifications and skill base might be more easily recognized by employers. Taken in total, traditional majors in Latin America seem to offer a broader and more flexible preparation, not unlike general education in the United States. Based on the findings from our study, it would appear that policies and changes in system design over the last two decades have been poorly informed by data on the complex relationship between higher education and the labor market. Consequently, public institutions appear to be less likely to prepare their graduates to meet the real demands of the labor market, perhaps even less so than a decade ago. As such, governmental policies have been successful in diversifying the supply side of higher education, but remarkably ineffective in changing student preferences or the labor market for graduates. Our results suggest that students might have a better feel of what the market demands than policymakers do and that the simple introduction of new majors is unlikely to change the economy. An extensive analysis can be found in: Cabrera, A., W. de Vries, and S. Anderson (2008). Job Satisfaction Among Mexican Alumni: A Case of Incongruence Between Hunch-Based Policies and Labor Market Demands, Higher Education. [Online] Available: http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/Number54/p20_de_Vries_et_al.htm |