|
|||||
Joint-Venture Campuses in China
Osman Ozturgut
In the mid- to late 1990s, the Chinese government endorsed Sino-foreign education cooperation for modernizing and expanding the Chinese higher education system to better serve the developing market economy. The decree released by China's Ministry of Education in 2003 approved 721 jointly run educational institutions in China. Activities range from codeveloped new institutions to a foreign degree franchised to an existing Chinese university. The Chinese government emphasizes that such foreign higher education institutions should provide foreign educational resources of excellent quality. However, with almost no program evaluations or strict accreditation measures, the quality of such programs has been placed under question. Most of the programs approved by the Beijing government are also accredited by the accreditation agencies in those universities' home countrieswith, however, almost no ongoing oversight on the quality of these programs.
Current Issues After being admitted, students who cannot provide proof of English-language proficiency are placed in intensive language-training programs for half a semester during (at most) one academic year. Expecting students with such limited training to read and comprehend the English-language textbooks on international business, human resources management, and other fields is unrealistic yet financially remunerative for these Sino-foreign joint ventures. These Western institutions, which fear causing Chinese students to lose face (and thus losing the tuition-based revenues), are allowing the students to graduate basically without English-language skillslet alone without substantive competency in their major fields. These factors raise questions concerning the value of foreign diplomas from so-called prestigious Western universities. In addition, with some branch campuses now utilizing local teachers for the instruction of transferable college classes in Chinese, not all students need to learn English. Concerning faculty members teaching at such institutions, the major issue involves the difficulty of finding qualified and experienced foreign instructors willing to come to China to teach, even for a semester. Such joint ventures provide rather low-end salaries, without adequate health coverage or opportunities for tenure. Foreigners coming to teach in China include mainly retired instructors coming for a paid holiday, inexperienced instructors seeking some practice before entering "real" academia, or people who cannot find a decent job elsewhere. While other legitimate reasons may exist for professors coming to China, most of those who stay for more than a year lack job prospects in their home countries or are retirees hoping to make China their home. And for some, it represents a more humanitarian commitment: bringing the best of the West to a developing country. The quality of teaching on joint-venture campuses has become a serious concern. The foreign teachers described above have almost no training on cross-cultural communications skills, teaching experience, or in some cases any academic qualification whatsoever. The qualifications and skills ordered for teaching English in China are simplistic: be a native from an English-speaking country and look white (Western). If you meet these demands, long-closed doors in China are opened to you with all the psychological, social, cultural, and financial benefits. You can pretend to be your most favorite character, enjoy a great culture, and put some money aside for your student loans and car payments. However, truly qualified instructors find it rather discouraging when asked by the administration to make allowances when the students "cheat," "sleep during class," "miss the majority of their classes," or "do not turn in homework." That is to say, giving transferable college credit for inferior work has been a norm on these joint-venture campuses.
Conclusion With the increasing number of Sino-foreign universities in China, institutions are pursuing rather aggressive marketing strategies to recruit students. Some administrators are lowering the admissions criteria. Instructors are cutting their expectations in classrooms. If on-site administrators and instructors fail, home campuses would blame them, mostly unaware of the sacrifices that are being made to operate such programs. These joint ventures may not be successful and profitable in the long run. Some joint ventures are failing to provide quality instruction. It is not necessarily something they can correct, given the lack of English-language skills of students and political and sociocultural challenges. I highly recommend that such joint-venture campuses stop recruiting, graduate their current students, and leave China if they are concerned with the quality of the education being provided. [Online] Available: http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/Number53/p16_Ozturgut.htm |