|
|||
|
Syrian Higher Education: Responding to a Changing Economy
David Hardy and Roger Munns
The economy of the Syrian Arab Republic is heavily reliant on oil and agriculture. Under the leadership of President Bashar Al-Assad, the government is seeking to diversify the economic base, putting in place a social market economy with a vibrant business sector. To achieve these aims a reformed higher education sector is seen as a priority by the president. He wishes to see high-quality, relevant education geared to the needs of business and the economy.
The Background The current education policy gives all school leavers who pass the baccalaureate exam the opportunity to go into higher education. Out of 114,298 school leavers who passed in 2006, 98,718 continued into higher educationuniversities or Higher Education Instituteswhich is about 22 percent of all school leavers. In 2005/06 there were 244,292 undergraduate and 12,384 postgraduate students at state universities. Popular information technology courses at the University of Damascus have a student/staff ratio of 100/1. Humanities courses have so many students that self-study is the norm, with maybe 10 percent of students attending lectures. Assessment is hugely difficult given the numbers. The use of multiple-choice essay questions emphasizes the difficultythat is, there is not enough time to mark student essays. Students are allocated to subjects according to their baccalaureate marks rather than demand. Teaching is often of poor quality. A whole generation of teachers were instructed in the former Soviet Union and have hardly been updated since. The education process is driven by political and not market needs. Its origins lie in the 1970s and the late President Assad's "open-door" policy. Appropriate then, it is now placing massive strain on the system. Recent Developments In addressing these issues the government has already taken a number of significant steps. The president has instigated the setting up of six new private universities since 2003. The private universities charge high fees and enroll few students so far. There are no publicly available statistics on the number of students at private universities. As an indication, however, the University of Kalamoon has 2,500 students. The private institutions have much greater autonomy and local management control than the state universities. Nevertheless, private university management must still comply with national regulations to be accredited and licensed by the state as a degree-awarding institution. Thus the criteria for the appointment of a dean in a private university are set by the minister of higher education, although unlike their state counterparts the appointment is for the institution to make. While instigated by the president, in the case of Kalamoon the university was set up by local business people in discussion with key members of the government. Some of the funding came from individuals who had been successful in business overseas and wished to put something back into the local economy. In addition and again promoted by the president, the Ministry of Higher Education has established four Centres of Excellence outside the state university framework. The Higher Institute for Applied Science and Research, the Higher Institute for Business Administration, the Institute of National Administration, and the Syrian Virtual University all have more selective admissions procedures. The business sector, as represented by the Chamber of Industry, expresses concerns of the ability of state institutions to change fast. They are currently pinning their hopes on the private universities. Businesses represented by the Chamber of Industry state that their method of funding (student fees) forces the private universities to focus on the quality of instruction and the employability of graduates. The same concerns about higher education in general are expressed by the State National Directorate (responsible inter alia for higher education and reporting to the president), and State Planning Commission (responsible for the country's Five-Year, or National Indicative, Plan). Their concerns include: a lack of clear strategic thinking; the need to strengthen quality assurance; the required retraining and updating of academic staff; and the slow-speed response and lack of flexibility.
The Future The strength of European views should not be overestimated, however; rapidly growing economies such as India have influence at a time when Europe has been almost invisible. There is a debate within government on the degree of decentralization required. If there are to be stakeholders other than government, then higher education must be made more accountable to parents, communities, business, and so on for the quality and relevance of its processes and the learning outcomes of courses of study. This contrasts with the current focus of a more authoritarian centralized system that primarily holds the state institutions accountable to public authorities. As is intended (but not yet demonstrated) with the private universities, well-managed decentralization has the potential to improve the quality and relevance of higher education by creating a management style focusing on enablement and motivation rather than direction and control. It potentially enables teachers, parents, and business to find solutions to education and training problems. These are the people who are closer to the specific issues than government ministers and officials. The policy proposals are sound. Their implementation will be a challenge. It is not so much a matter of financial resource as the need for the knowledge and skills to take the reform agenda forward and the fundamental necessity to change long-entrenched attitudes. It is also important that the government does not raise expectations so high that citizens become disappointed when the results take time to come. [Online] Available: http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/Number48/p19_Hardy_Munns.htm |