|
|||
|
A Policy Shift in Botswana's Higher Education Landscape
Isaac N. Obasi
A country with about 1.7 million people, Botswana is generally described by development scholars as an exceptional African success story. Politically it has been a model of democracy on a continent where military dictatorship reigned for too long. It is also an economic miracle, having transformed itself from one of the poorest countries in the world at its independence in 1966 to its present status of a middle-income country. Presently, the country's tertiary education sector consists of one university and a number of other postsecondary institutions. A key feature of its higher education landscape is public ownership and control. However, as elsewhere, the forces of globalization and internal demands for expansion of access are exerting tremendous pressures for change. Consequently, in line with global trends, a new tertiary education policy is being proposed.
Pressures on the Higher Education Landscape The existing order has increasingly come under pressure for change. Proponents cite the inability of the existing university to expand access, which has already led to the idea of a second university. Designated as an international university of science and technology, the new university has been planned to introduce a new market orientation into the higher education landscape. Proponents also cite the overdependence of the university on government funding as both precarious and unsustainable. The decreasing support in the last two years is a danger signal. In the 2005/06 fiscal year, government funding provided about 66 percent of the university's budget.
The Direction of the Emerging Policy Although the TEC proposes wider changes in line with globalization, it also provides an affirmation of some policies and practices that are already in place. For example, some years ago, the University of Botswana implemented a restructuring policy in line with global trends of managerial-oriented leadership, privatization, the outsourcing of such services, and the commercialization of some services. At the level of the state, the government has already adopted some neoliberal policies such as privatization, public-private partnership, and outsourcing of selected services. In the education sector, the government has cautiously introduced a partial cost-sharing policy at the secondary school level as a testing ground for the future. Furthermore, ownership of tertiary education institutions has been liberalized and the extent of private providers is growing. It is estimated that in 2004, over 100 private providers registered with the Ministry of Education, mainly for the running of nondegree technical and vocational programs. However, there are other foreign private providers running professional and master's degree programs. For example, the Limkokwing University in Malaysia has been offered registration by the TEC to run both diploma and degree programs. So far only a few private higher education providers have been registered and accredited by the TEC.
Fear of Losing the "Only Son" Status A concomitant issue concerns alternative and sustainable sources of funding. In line with globalization trends elsewhere, the adoption of a cost-sharing policy by the university is a likely option. However, this approach may be more controversial than in other developing countries, for citizens are long used to what a recent report by a government-appointed council (the Business Economic Advisory Council) called "a culture of entitlements" and of living in a "comfort zone." The council's characterization of Botswana as "a relatively low-income country with a high-income lifestyle" does not raise any hope that a cost-sharing policy would be easy to implement. [Online] Available: http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/Number46/p20_Obasi.htm |