International Higher Education, Fall 2002
Evolution of Private Higher Education in Ukraine
Joseph Stetar and Elena
Berezkina
Joseph Stetar is professor of education at Seton Hall University, Kozlowski
Hall, South Orange, NJ 07079. E-mail: <Stetarjo@shu.edu>.
Elena Berezinka is a Ph.D. student in the higher education program at Seton
Hall University.
The emergence of private education in Ukraine is tied to the country's need to address rapidly changing and long-suppressed educational, cultural, and economic challenges following independence in 1991. The emergence of Ukrainian nationalism and the beginning of a shift toward a more market-oriented economy highlighted significant gaps in the public sector--gaps the emerging private higher education institutions were quick to fill. Private higher education also served as a catalyst for a range of cultural, language, and religious groups seeking to reassert their identity following decades of Russification. Today, the Ministry of Education estimates private higher education institutions comprise about 6 percent of the total number
Private higher education in Ukraine has undergone several stages of development in the last decade. The first private institutions emerged in 1991-1992 and rapidly grew in number over the next two years. State accreditation of private institutions began in 1995-1996. In the years from 1997 to 2000, private higher education institutions gained state recognition and issued their first diplomas
The majority of Ukrainian private higher education institutions utilize a "niche" strategy--that is, they orient their educational policy toward some limited but comparatively stable and underserved segment of the educational market. Conflicts between state and private higher education institutions usually arise over a narrow circle of the most profitable Ukraine specialties--e.g., law, economics, or management.
Governance
Ukrainian legislation regarding the establishment of educational institutions
is Byzantine in structure and prescribes different and unequal procedures for
state and private institutions. For example, private higher education institutions
are considered businesses and unlike their state counterparts are governed by
commercial, not educational, law. State policy on private higher education institutions
is largely contained in two legislative documents under discussion since late
2001 that have still not been approved by the Ukrainian government: the draft
of the law on higher education and the draft of the new National Doctrine of
the Development of Ukrainian Education in the 21st century.
Financing
The financing of private higher education institutions in Ukraine remains complex
and is one of the key problems for private higher education. Tuition is the
principle source of financial support; however, a few private higher education
institutions have managed to attract funds from local (e.g., city and regional)
authorities. In several other instances, private higher education institutions
have been able to secure financial support from business enterprises both privatized
and state operated.
Licensing and
Accreditation
One of the most significant changes in the system of classifying Ukrainian higher
education institutions is the state-run licensing and accreditation process.
Licensing, the first step in accreditation, is a temporary right granted by
the state permitting an institution to begin operations. The first licensing
of private higher education institutions occurred in 1993. By January 2000,
138 higher education institutions in Ukraine were licensed.
The most difficult dimension of the accreditation procedure is not its complexity, but rather the long set of strict quantitative accreditation requirements adopted by the State Accreditation Commission (SAC) that goes far beyond the ability of the vast majority of emerging private institution to meet. In setting accreditation criteria unattainable for many higher education institutions, the SAC may not have intended to undermine the Ukrainian higher education system or shut down most private institutions. However, the SAC clearly used formal requirements as bureaucratic cover for the informal relations that inevitably arise between the accrediting organs and institutions.
Many Ukrainian observers believe the current process of accreditation is cut off from reality and actually a product of organizational and professional incompetence. As one Ukrainian scholar states, "If an American university, having exclusively a Nobel-prizewinning teaching staff, decided to transfer its base into Ukraine, it would not even be able to obtain a license here (without a bribe, of course), and it could only dream about accreditation."
The Future
of Ukrainian Higher Education
Future development of private higher education in Ukraine is unpredictable since
it depends on critical government and legislative decisions currently under
discussion. Depending upon the climate set by the Ukrainian Parliament that
was elected in spring 2002, the landscape of private higher education is expected
to change dramatically. Private higher education may expand or contract, but
it is unlikely to retain its current shape or scope.
Data from a national sampling of leaders in Ukrainian private higher education suggest a pessimistic outlook especially in light of demographic trends. A declining birthrate is expected to produce an enrollment gap in the decade ending in 2010 that will dramatically affect the Ukrainian education system. This gap originated in the second half of 1980s due to the Chernobyl disaster and the economic uncertainties associated with perestroika. During the 1990s, the demographic gap eliminated most Ukrainian kindergartens. Ukrainian secondary schools are also at risk now. When this destructive wave reaches higher education demand will significantly decrease, while the competition between higher education institutions will reach a peak. According to Ministry of Education data, if the index of demand for higher education in 2002 is 1.0, it will decrease to 0.86 in 2007, to 0.64 in 2012, and to 0.61 in 2013.
The stratification of Ukrainian private higher education is also expected to increase in the next decade. Just over 20 percent of private higher education institutions have market positions stable enough to secure their future existence. The remaining 80 percent are expected to close or merge with larger private or state institutions.