International Higher Education, Spring 2000
Bridging the Gap Bewteen Higher and Secondary Education in Russia
The successful functioning of the educational system as a social institution requires maintaining continuity and consistency between different levels, especially secondary and higher education. This poses a challenge for educators and policymakers seeking to ensure sustainable development of a national system of education. In Russia, the interaction between secondary and higher education has become a serious problem that must be resolved in the near future.
Rising Demand
Traditionally, Russian higher education was designed to prepare highly qualified
professionals or specialists. Admission to public universities, which comprise
about two-thirds of all Russian universities, is based on applicants' performance
on entrance examinations. In the last five years, the demand for higher education
has grown to historic levels: in 1999, there were 246 students per 10,000 population.
Nevertheless, the proportion of the population in Russia that participates in
higher education (2.4 percent) is much smaller than that in most developed countries.
University entrance examinations have become much more competitive. In 1999,
there were more than 200 applicants for every 100 places in public universities.
In the most prestigious universities, the number of applicants can amount to
as many as 12 to 14 for each place.
Admissions Requirements
A major problem is the significant gap between highly demanding university entrance
examinations and the insufficient levels of knowledge that school graduates
possess. This gap means that secondary school graduates need additional preparation
to gain admission to higher educational institutions. According to some estimates,
no more than one-third of students enter university while relying solely on
the knowledge acquired in school. Another one-third take special preparatory
courses; approximately one-fifth hire private tutors, and as many educate themselves.
The burden of extra work and expenses weighs heavily on secondary school students and their families. Private classes to prepare for entrance examinations cost between $10 and $40 an hour. Given the current economic crisis and the low standard of living of most Russians, many young people find it difficult to gain admission to institutions of higher education. Also, the system creates abundant possibilities for corruption (bribes, favors for the well-connected, etc.).
The other side of this problem is that the "quality" of incoming students, in the opinion of many faculty members, is diminishing from year to year across the country. The level of students' general knowledge and skills is quite low. They are unable to work independently and lack initiative. It can be said that students need the additional courses and tutoring, not just to pass the entrance examinations but also to prepare them for their university studies. The new regulations that prescribe strict correspondence between courses taught in secondary schools and university admission requirements have not yet raised academic standards.
Filling the gap between secondary and higher education and finding a balance between educational levels are very important issues in Russia. The dilemma is deciding how to address these issues: should we lift secondary education up to the level of higher education or should we lower the standards of admission down to current standards at the secondary level?
Meanwhile, demographic trends in Russia have moved the debate over these problems to another arena. Stiff competition for admission to universities is expected to last until 2004, when the number of secondary school graduates will begin to decrease. By 2009 entrance examinations will be meaningless because the number of secondary school graduates will be less than the number of available places in public universities (1.3 million school graduates and 1.7 million places in higher educational and secondary professional institutions). Moreover, this situation will occur in some regions (including the major cities of Moscow and Petersburg) in just four years. The reason is a demographic decline in the age cohort. All this is throwing out new challenges for Russian education and society. Which should have priority: providing advanced professional and vocational education for everyone or maintaining the competition for the spaces in the university? Also, the absence of competition for admission to public universities would lead to a decline in the number of students at private universities. Only the most successful private institutions would survive (there are now 251,000 students in private universities and 3,347,000 in public ones).
An active search recently ended for strategies to resolve this and other problems in Russia. In January 2000, a new "national doctrine of education in the Russian Federation" was discussed at the All-Russia meeting of educators. The doctrine, which was developed over a two-year period, defines the issues of high priority in Russian education--namely, financing and future development. It was recently passed into law by Parliament and guarantees tuition-free professional and higher education for 50 percent of the students (those who pass a competitive examination) and tuition-free graduate education for those who pass another examination. Those who do not score well enough on the examinations will pay tuition.
To fill the gap between secondary and higher education, there is a need to change existing admission procedures in higher education institutions. One option under discussion is admissions based on secondary school graduation certificates. This system is followed in France and Germany. However, in Russia such a system would seem to be unrealizable as yet due to major descrepancies between standards of secondary education in urban and village areas. Village areas account for about 70 percent of all schools, and the quality of education there is quite poor. Another option is introducing a system of centralized national testing (as in the United States), which also has its own pros and cons.
Bridging the gap between secondary and higher education also requires greater continuity and consistency in the curricula of secondary and higher education; establishing multilayer educational institutions that include both secondary and higher educational institutions; negotiating contracts between schools and universities about cooperation; and upgrading teachers’ qualifications, among other things. Finally, a gradual transition to a 12-year school system will reduce the excessive workload on secondary school students and enhance preparation for the university by improving the quality of education.