International Higher Education, Winter 2000
Chinese Higher Education: 21st Century Challenges
Mme. Hao Keming, Professor; Director General, National Center for Education
Development Research, State Education Commission, People's Republic of China.
Address: 37 Dumchang Hutong. Beijing, China. FAX 86-1.602-0615.
The 21st century poses challenges for education worldwide in an all-around way. The development of the human race in the future will be more civilized and advanced than today. As human societies continue to develop in the 21st century, higher education will play a more prominent role as the base for training qualified personnel. Rapid economic, scientific, technological and social development will set higher demands on higher education for the number and quality of trained personnel for higher education.
In the past 45 years since the founding of People's Republic of China, especially in the last 16 years since the reform and opening of the economy, higher education has experienced great progress. Chinese higher education has already been developed into a multimission and multilevel system with a complete range of academic disciplines. These achievements have laid the foundation for further development of higher education in China.
However, with rapid developments in the economy, and in science and technology, Chinese higher education inevitably faces new challenges.
The
Conflict between the Increasingly High Demand for and Low Input in Higher
Education
The recent decades have been a crucial period of time for China as it works
to set up a socialist market economy, to reach the second-phase strategic
goals of modernization, and to advance to the third-phase goals. Socioeconomic
development will increase the demands on education in every aspect. Besides,
China is a large country with 1.2 billion people, with an annual birthrate
of 20 million. In spite of the government's birth control policy, the population
of China will reach 1.3 billion by the beginning of the 21 century. The population
of two age groups of children and teenagers (under 14-year-old) and working-age
people (15 to 64 years of age) will be 356 million and 839 million, respectively,
constituting enormous demands on formal and informal education in both the
compulsory and postcompulsory systems. The fact that the higher education
enrollment growth rate was over 20 percent for two years running in 1992 and
1993 is evidence of these trends.
Nonetheless, China is a developing country whose economic foundation is rather weak. According to 1994 World Bank statistical data, China's GNP per capita for 1992 was U.S.$470 - the 28th-lowest among the 42 low-income economies. In the past decade, despite the considerable increase in the educational budget, the total educational budgetary input remained low. The statistical data for 1993 show that China's educational expenditure is about 1.04 percent of the world's total. However, the number of students in China's formal education system constitute 17.9 percent of the world's total student body. Therefore, facing us are urgent issues of how to depart from the Chinese realities to increase the input in education by both the government and the whole society, how to streamline the educational structure to promote a balance between the development of higher education and socioeconomic development, how to increase the effective utilizing of educational resources, and how best to meet the higher education needs of people.
A
Socialist Market Economy: New Demands and Challenges for Higher Education
China is currently undergoing a transition from a planned economy to a socialist-market
economy, involving reforms in many aspects of economic and social life and
posing new challenges for education reform and development.
There was a considerable amount of overlap in institutions' missions and their academic programs, thus keeping the already limited resources from being rationally allocated and utilized, and creating a large amount of waste. The problems of the higher education system had negative effects on moves to improve curriculum and teaching. Therefore, the reform of the higher education system is an important approach to developing higher education in China. Although much work has been done in this regard and some lessons and experience gained, the current higher education system as a whole is still unable to meet the demands of social and economic progress. How to accelerate the pace of higher education system reform has become a pressing challenge for Chinese educators.
Education and economic activities belong to different realms of social functions, each having its own patterns and characteristics. In the course of reform of the educational system, it is necessary to handle properly the relationship between education and socialist market economy. The process of education is long term, and the consequences of educational reform can only be felt after several decades, and thus affects one or more generations. Therefore, when we look at the imperatives of higher education reform, we have to take its demanding and complicated nature into consideration. We ought to look at and learn from the successful experiences of other countries and from our own, and be both positive and cautious at each step we take in our higher education reform.
Rapid
Scientific and Technological Development and Social Progress Call for a Faster
and Deeper Reform of Higher Education
The current trend, in which modern science and technology develop, differentiate,
and integrate rapidly, calls for a fundamental reform in curriculum and teaching
methodology in Chinese universities and colleges. New requirements regarding
the quality of higher education are raised in the context of a fast-developing
economy, expanding international cooperation, and social progress. The constraints
of traditional methods have become evident, such as concentration on instruction
in specialized knowledge rather than a student's all-around ability. Such
practice does not cater to the diversified needs of students, fails to let
them take initiative in seeking, analyzing, and applying knowledge, and limits
their creativeness.
Problems such as narrowly defined specialties and irrational disciplinary
structure exist. Institutions of different types and levels overlap in their
missions and do not play up their own strengths. Instructional content, course
structure as well as the organization of knowledge need updating and improvement.
There is a gap between what is taught and what is actually happening in social
and productive life. In addition, some teaching methods and pedagogies are
out of date. It is, therefore, a fundamental requirement for the socioeconomic
development of the country that higher education do the following: